D3IP were presented with a Maritime challenge with a deceptively simple question: can you ensure command and control (C2) capabilities when the environment is actively working against you? Modern operations increasingly face sophisticated electronic warfare, cyber-attack, and anti-access/area-denial tactics — all designed to disrupt or sever the communication pathways that everything else depends on. We opened the challenge to the D3IP Community to utilise the industry and academic expertise and through a tight six-week discovery phase, this is what we learned.
In Plain Terms
Command and control (C2) is the exercise of authority and direction over resources, systems, and forces to accomplish a mission. A denied or degraded environment is one where the usual ways of staying connected can’t be relied on. That can happen through:
- Jamming and electronic warfarethat drowns out radio signals
- Cyber-attacks that target the network itself
- Area-denial tactics that cut off satellite or infrastructure links
- Simple environmental disruption – weather, sea state, distance, etc.
Length of the Discovery activity.
Number of partner responses received.
Core technology pillars involved.
The phased roadmap recommended.
Communications you can’t take for granted
Traditional naval communications lean heavily on pathways that a capable adversary can predict, jam, or intercept. As platforms become more distributed and increasingly uncrewed, the stakes rise: losing the link can mean losing control. The challenge wasn’t to find a single decisive fix, it was to understand how established and emerging technologies could be combined into something genuinely resilient.
Three questions framed the work:
Three findings that shaped everything
- No single solution exists. Survivable C2 in contested conditions comes from layering multiple approaches that work in concert – established technologies alongside emerging ones, managed by intelligent orchestration that adapts to conditions in real time.
- Open, modular integration is essential. Solutions that are bearer-agnostic and standards-based integrate far more quickly with legacy platforms and coalition partners. Middlewear and translation layers reduce bespoke engineering while keeping operators firmly in control.
- Assurance is continuous, not static. Trustworthy systems log their decisions, expose their health and routing choices, and recover fast after compromise. Assurance is an ongoing process, not a one-time certification.
Seven pilliars, one resilient fabric
The assesment settled on seven complementary technology pillars. Each contributes something the others can’t, and the real value comes from weaving them together so that traffic can move seamlessly between them as conditions change.
| Technology Pillar | What It Brings | Maturity |
|---|---|---|
| Line-of-sight alternatives | High-bandwidth, secure & hard-to-detect links (optical and highly directional) where conditions allow. | |
| Resilient RF techniques | The dependable backbone, with improved resistance to jamming and interference. | |
| Autonomous networking | Self-healing mesh networks that reroute around failure with minimal operator burden. | |
| Multiple bearers | Diversity across satellite, radio & high-altitude paths that removes single points of failure. | |
| Cyber resilience | Trust built in at the protocol level, with rapid recovery after attack. | |
| Low-probability intercept/detection | Stealth that reduces an adversary’s ability to detect and target high-value platforms. | |
| Novel concepts | Next-generation ideas: quantum-resilient data, decentralised trust, cognitive networks. |
Four levers a commander can use
The strength of a portfolio approach is that it gives decision-makers levels to adjust according to the mission in front of them, rather than a fixed configuration to live with.
- Capacity: Push high-bandwidth traffic when conditions are favourable, and scale back gracefully when they’re not.
- Covertness: Route critical traffic stealthily to reduce the chance of detection and targeting.
- Recoverability. Rebuild trust and connectivity quickly after compromise, rather than depending on links never being lost.
- Credibility: Provide real-time evidence of assurance, so operators can trust (and audit) when the network is doing.
From denied to assured: a phased path
None of this happens overnight. The Discovery activity identified a phased, 10-year direction of travel: prove the mature technologies first, then broaden trials and coalition interoperability, and finally field the transformational capabilities on the back of hard evidence.
Early engagement, at pace
This is what D3IP is built to do: take a real problem from a challenge owner and put it in front of a diverse community of innovators – early, and without the prohibitive cost and time pressures of traditional procurement. In six weeks, a single question became an evidence-led roadmap.
Help shape what Defence builds next
The D3IP Community connects innovators with Defence challenge owners at the earliest stage — where the thinking is still open and the opportunities are greatest. Joining is free for eligible organisations.
Discover more from D3IP…
FCCM Initiative: Can AI Take the Burden Out of Army Capability Planning?
What if AI could handle some of the most resource-intensive work in defence capability planning? That was the challenge the British Army sought to solve using D3IP’s Innovation as a Service model and collaboration network.
Synthetic Data in Defence: Faster Innovation Without the Security Risk
What if Defence could experiment, train AI models, and test new systems without ever risking classified data? D3IP’s Synthetic Data Production Initiative, delivered in partnership with the Defence BattleLab, set out to answer exactly that question with the help of our SME community. Here’s what we found, and how you can get involved in future initiatives.
Register Your Interest in the D3IP Community
© 2025 D3IP | D3IP is a brand of DII Ltd.
Resources
© 2025 D3IP | D3IP is a brand of DII Ltd.
Proudly Supporting
